Should World Leaders Have to Pass Physical and Mental Fitness Exams?

In today’s high stakes global environment, the question of whether world leaders should undergo mandatory mental and physical fitness tests is gaining traction. 

 Leaders, who make decisions that affect millions of people, should be able to handle the pressures of office well, according to advocates. These kinds of tests could make sure that people making decisions are still sharp, able to handle problems, and can handle stress well. However, critics worry that these tests could be misused for political gain or used to unfairly exclude capable leaders based on subjective criteria.

 They argue that leadership qualities extend beyond physical or mental fitness, encompassing experience, wisdom, and a proven record of public service.  Additionally, the selection criteria for these examinations could become a contentious issue due to their wide range of cultural and political contexts. As the debate continues, policymakers must balance the desire for transparent, capable leadership with the risks of overstepping into personal liberties and political manipulation.

 Do you think that world leaders would be better able to govern if they had to take fitness tests, or could this cause unnecessary political debate?